Unclear baselines
Without a starting measure, later results cannot show how much knowledge changed.
Government and NGOs
Use structured assessments to understand knowledge change before and after an intervention.

The evaluation challenge
Programme teams need more than activity counts to understand whether an intervention improved knowledge. Juwazi supports aligned baseline and follow-up assessments, organized cohorts and clearer analysis.
Without a starting measure, later results cannot show how much knowledge changed.
Different questions or delivery conditions make comparisons across time and cohorts less useful.
Combining results from locations and partner teams can delay learning and reporting.
Where it fits
Build comparable evidence before, during and after an intervention.
Establish participant knowledge before programme activities begin.
Identify emerging gaps while there is still time to adjust delivery.
Measure knowledge after the intervention using an aligned approach.
Check whether important knowledge remains after programme completion.
A clearer way to assess
Juwazi helps evaluation teams establish baselines, run comparable follow-up assessments and understand change across groups.
Measure knowledge before programme delivery.
Use comparable measures after the intervention.
Understand patterns across groups and locations.
Present useful assessment findings to stakeholders.
What Juwazi brings together
Keep instruments, participant groups and results connected throughout the evaluation cycle.
Create assessment sets that support meaningful comparison across evaluation points.
Retain the group, location or partner context needed to interpret performance.
Apply clear delivery rules across baseline, interim and follow-up sessions.
Review patterns across time and groups before preparing stakeholder reports.
What better looks like
Related use cases
Built for what matters