Juwazi

Government and NGOs

Measure what programmes help people learn.

Use structured assessments to understand knowledge change before and after an intervention.

Programme evaluation team analyzing assessment results

The evaluation challenge

Measure knowledge change with a process built for comparison.

Programme teams need more than activity counts to understand whether an intervention improved knowledge. Juwazi supports aligned baseline and follow-up assessments, organized cohorts and clearer analysis.

01

Unclear baselines

Without a starting measure, later results cannot show how much knowledge changed.

02

Inconsistent instruments

Different questions or delivery conditions make comparisons across time and cohorts less useful.

03

Manual consolidation

Combining results from locations and partner teams can delay learning and reporting.

Where it fits

Assessment at the points that matter

Build comparable evidence before, during and after an intervention.

01

Baseline assessment

Establish participant knowledge before programme activities begin.

02

Interim learning check

Identify emerging gaps while there is still time to adjust delivery.

03

Endline assessment

Measure knowledge after the intervention using an aligned approach.

04

Follow-up study

Check whether important knowledge remains after programme completion.

A clearer way to assess

Turn programme activity into evidence of learning.

Juwazi helps evaluation teams establish baselines, run comparable follow-up assessments and understand change across groups.

01

Baseline assessment

Measure knowledge before programme delivery.

02

Follow-up assessment

Use comparable measures after the intervention.

03

Cohort comparison

Understand patterns across groups and locations.

04

Evidence reporting

Present useful assessment findings to stakeholders.

What Juwazi brings together

Make programme learning easier to compare and use.

Keep instruments, participant groups and results connected throughout the evaluation cycle.

Aligned instruments

Create assessment sets that support meaningful comparison across evaluation points.

Cohort structure

Retain the group, location or partner context needed to interpret performance.

Consistent administration

Apply clear delivery rules across baseline, interim and follow-up sessions.

Comparative insight

Review patterns across time and groups before preparing stakeholder reports.

What better looks like

Assessment that supports the decision after it.

A clearer view of knowledge change
Consistent measures across cohorts
Less spreadsheet consolidation
Stronger evidence for programme learning

Built for what matters

Build a more reliable programme evaluation assessment process.

Open Juwazi